Starlings for product teams
Why it was built, next to what was built.
User interviews, decisions, specs and GitHub issues, on the product they belong to. Your team and your coding agents work from the same history, so nobody has to ask why a change was made.
Your week today
- User interviews sit in a notetaker, and the insight never reaches the issue.
- Specs live in one tool, issues in another, and the decision behind them in a chat thread.
- A coding agent can read the repository, but not the call where the team decided what to build.
- Every week someone writes an update by reading five tools.
How the work runs in Starlings.
- 01
Interview
Run user interviews in Starlings, or let your Mac transcribe a Zoom, Teams or Google Meet call. The transcript lands on the product.
- 02
Decide
Record what the team settled as a decision, with its source: a call, a line in the thread or a note.
- 03
Build
Map a GitHub repository to the product. Issues and pull requests appear in Work, and every change shows up in the product’s thread.
- 04
Hand off
Give an issue to an agent. Tasks and issues share one set of stages, agents hold cards the way people do, and anyone can take a card back.
Jobs your agents can take.
Connect Claude, or hand a task to a shared agent. It works from the same project as your team, and Starlings logs each action under the name of the person who asked.
- Pick up a GitHub issue on a mapped repository and report back on the card.
- Draft a spec from the product’s user interviews and the decisions already made.
- Summarize what changed this week from the product’s issues, calls and thread.
What you can stop paying for.
- A meeting notetaker for user interviews
- Specs and decisions spread across a wiki and chat
- A separate board next to GitHub
- Integrations that copy issues into chat